Case: Document Builder Request for 1C
A company wanted to automate document creation. Key arguments for choosing 1C-Bukhgalteriya:
-
The system was already purchased — minimal extra costs.
-
Low implementation risks.
-
Immediate results.
Conclusion: If a task can be solved cheaply, avoid complex platforms.
Why Vendors Charge Millions
Expensive document builders often include:
-
Custom text editors (like Word/Google Docs clones).
-
Integrations with heavy systems.
-
Marketing budgets passed on to clients.
Example:
Developing a Word-like editor costs hundreds of millions. Vendors recover these costs through high tariffs.
Alternative Approach: Low-Code + Existing Tools
-
Use templates in Word/Google Docs.
-
Upload them to a low-code platform to set up logic.
-
Automate without paying for redundant features.
Benefits:
-
Cost: ~$150/year (vs millions for enterprise solutions).
-
Implementation in 1-2 days instead of months.
-
Transparent pricing — no hidden fees.
When Is an Expensive Tool Justified?
-
Complex ERP/CRM integration is required.
-
Unique functionality is needed for specific tasks.
-
The company can wait 3-5 years for ROI.
For 90% of businesses, basic automation suffices.
Calculating Efficiency
ROI formula for low-code:
Copy
(Time saved × Employee salary) – License cost
Example:
-
Automating 10 documents/day saves 2 hours.
-
At 7/hour:∗∗7/hour:∗∗14/day** saved.
-
Annual savings: 3,360∗∗withasolutioncosting∗∗3,360∗∗withasolutioncosting∗∗750.
Why Vendors Hide Prices?
-
Upselling strategy: Hook clients first, then upsell.
-
High costs: Can’t compete with affordable alternatives.
Our stance: Prices should be transparent. Check the "Pricing" section on our website.